How to get Multiple Offers, and what to do when you do!

March 13, 2017

For the last 3 years, we have experienced a shortage of quality homes for sale in Santa Clarita. That’s no big surprise, “tight inventory” is all over many real estate related reports. It is for that reason that 2016 was the fourth year in a row of price appreciation, especially in the lower price ranges. Too many buyers for too few homes caused about 10% appreciation for the year. At some point, of course, this will stop, but it’s hard to imagine it happening anytime soon. Today, we have under 400 resale homes and townhomes for sale in a valley of over 200,000 people. Even adding in the 11 new construction projects and their available homes leaves us with about 40% of what would be needed for a “normal” 4-month supply of homes. Meaning, that a marketplace in which multiple offers are common will likely be around for a while.

It is in this kind of supply/demand environment that we often see a new listing come up and there be multiple buyers making offers for that property. That is what today’s post is about, as I regularly see sellers and their agents mishandle this opportunity. Worst case, they take the first offer that comes in, something happens in escrow and 30 days later they have to come back on the market. So many times I’ve seen that cost sellers tens of thousands of dollars and untold aggravation. That can be avoided, though, by following some important tips that give the best possible outcome for buyer and seller alike. Let’s assume then, that the seller wants not just the best possible price, but also TERMS that lead to the timeframes they need and a smooth escrow without surprises or disappointments. I’ll offer a few tips to buyers at the end, but this is mostly for those that plan to sell in a tight inventory market like we have today.

It is my experience that if a seller wants top dollar, that almost always comes in a multiple offer situation during the first month that the property has been for sale. I’ve heard many homeowners say they think a home was sold under market value because it sold right away, and that certainly has happened. Rarely does that happen, though, when the agent involved makes sure that ALL buyers in the marketplace see the new listing, and it stays on the market for a designated period of time – not just a day or two. In fact, almost always when a home sells right away for less than it could have, it is because the listing agent sold it to the first offer in the first few days on the market and, SURPRISE, often to their own buyer so they can get all of the commission. This happened so many times in the short sale market of 2009-2012 that banks today INSIST a home be on an auction website to ensure that the home can be bid on. For today, the tip is simply this – have your agent put in the remarks that the new listing will be open for viewing for a specific period of time (i.e. 7 days, 10 days or 2 weeks). Give those buyers and their agents a chance to get in and not feel rushed to jam an offer in right away. Encourage everyone to come and offer if qualified and interested. This creates a comfort zone to view and buy and still keeps the urgency up to get offers in. This all but guarantees that every buyer that is in the marketplace sees it, which is the key to getting top dollar.

Next, any prospective buyer should be encouraged to write and put their best foot forward to start with. This way you learn their true motivation. Once all offers are received, tip #2 is to write a “multiple counter offer” with respect to the buyers’ highest/best price and terms. It floors me how often agents don’t do this, and while there can be reasons to just accept a solid offer, why not find out what each offer’s best price and terms are? It simply takes an extra day or two, and a one page form. I prefer asking for “highest and best” as opposed to asking for a specific price, because this encourages buyers to truly give their best price, rather than meeting a specific number. You never know what that will be! Giving a “multiple counter offer” is also important to determine what the second-best offer is to be a potential “back up offer” in case something happens with buyer #1. Again, just because you are the hot new listing doesn’t mean things can’t happen in escrow, and you want to be prepared if they do. For buyers, this is where a “cover letter” detailing your sincere interest in the home can help a seller feel comfortable being in escrow with you. Sometimes these letters can be a bit corny, but I’ve often seen them be the reason a seller chooses one buyer over another, even if their price is lower. Remember, a seller may be emotional about saying goodbye to their home. Knowing a buyer values it like they do can be powerful.

Last, terms are so, so, important (sometimes more so than price) but are rarely evaluated equally in a multiple offer situation. Removing all contingencies quickly means the seller has a solid deal. Until that is done, it isn’t even close to a “done deal”. By far the biggest issue in a rising price environment is the appraisal contingency. Just because a buyer offers $10,000 over asking…what happens if the lender’s appraiser doesn’t have recent sales to support it? I’ve spent hours and hours rebutting appraisals in the last 3 years, even after meeting the appraisers in person. Appraisers often don’t value things the way a buyer does. That’s just reality. For this reason, you should remove the appraisal contingency from the deal when possible. It may require the buyer to put more money down if it comes up short, but they don’t pay any more than the price they offered. Buyers, understand why removing the appraisal contingency will often be the reason you get the home – or don’t. Honestly, no one knows value better than a buyer that has been actively looking at every property for sale. They know better than appraisers! For sellers, if the appraisal contingency can’t be removed from the offers, at least shorten the amount of time to get it removed so you know if you have an issue. Sadly, many buyers will tie up a property, then try to renegotiate price when the appraiser suggests they paid more than market value. My feeling is if they are willing to pay over asking because of market conditions then they are going to pay that regardless of what the appraiser says. Get that in writing when you have the leverage to do so – in a multiple offer situation – before you open escrow. Happy selling!

 


Why the Future is Bright for Santa Clarita Real Estate

November 16, 2016

In a few months it will be a New Year and I will be sharing my review of 2016 in Real Estate, and what you might expect for 2017. Spoiler alert, 2016 was the fourth straight year of appreciation bringing many neighborhoods back to where they might have been at the height of the market 10 years ago. Some neighborhoods still aren’t there, but today over 90% of the homeowners in Santa Clarita have equity in their homes and the amount of distress sales is so low there is virtually no risk that we see any kind of a major adjustment in values. Yet, because of a Trump election and a market that seems overheated to many, I’m being asked more and more if an adjustment down in values is likely? The short answer is “no”, but why? Why will our valley perhaps even outperform other areas in California? The answer lies in some fundamental changes that were put in place years ago by a number of forward thinking leaders. These changes broadened and diversified Santa Clarita in almost every area economically and this year end post will share some things you probably didn’t know about our valley, and the why future is bright.

 

In the early 1990’s, we learned the hard way that jobs and confidence in those jobs was at the core of people’s motivation to buy a home. I started my Real Estate career in 1991 and for 7 straight years we had either a decline or no appreciation in values. It was almost entirely due to jobs, especially in aerospace and manufacturing, leaving the area. That market was also a market in which distress sales existed, though not nearly to the extent of 2006-2012. Remember, 2006-2012 was an anomaly that won’t happen again or even close to it. Why? Because Real Estate values have always been based on supply and demand, and as I will explain here demand for our valley will continue to grow for years to come because of the fundamentals. The keys to appreciation are jobs, interest rates and economic growth in an area, not funny money loans and rampant speculation with no basis in reality. Today, we have neither the speculation nor the easy loans available that drove the crash of 2006-2012. People that can’t afford loans can’t get them today, and that won’t change even if our new President loosens some of the laws. Further, the large amount of homes available 15 years ago has been replaced by a complete shortage. Our inventory in Santa Clarita in 2004-2007 averaged 2000 homes for sale. The last 4 years we have averaged about 500. Still, this last year has seen a slowdown in both the number of homes sold, and the strong appreciation that we experienced in 2013-2015. Many buyers can’t afford today’s prices. If interest rates go up, which is likely for a number of reasons, couldn’t that cool off the market and even lead to price decreases? In the short term it could. In the long term though, values are likely to stay strong and continue to appreciate in Santa Clarita. Here is why:

 

There are a lot of basics in place that if taken care of, will keep Santa Clarita strong. At the top of the list are outstanding schools and safe neighborhoods. We have our excellent teachers and law enforcement to thank for that, the majority of which live here and have a vested interest in maintaining it. Quality of life is always at the top of a homebuyer’s list when deciding where to raise their family and in all surveys, Santa Clarita shines. People want to live here, move their business here, take a new job here. They want to stay and buyer a bigger/smaller home here. But we had great schools and safe neighborhoods in the 90’s, so what’s better now? Simply stated, our job base. Years ago our city began a concerted effort to draw strong business with good paying jobs to our valley. That was our weakness in 1991-1997? That decline was fueled by TWO major employers leaving the area, Baxter and Lockheed. Today our valley is home to major companies in 7 different sectors at a level never before seen. Entertainment, Tourism, Health Care, Bio Med, Medical Devices, Internet marketing/Digital Media and a much broader manufacturing/Aerospace base have all blossomed here. The service/retail sector is much stronger as well. None of these sectors has more than 18% of the existing jobs here. Due to the efforts of our College, City leaders and the SCVEDC (Santa Clarita Valley Economic Development Corporation) all working together to attract new and diverse business, Santa Clarita was just named the #1 city in Los Angeles County for being business friendly. This is just the beginning with a lot more to add to names like Logix, Princess Cruises, Boston Scientific, Sunkist, Disney Ranch, Scorpion Design, Santa Clarita Studios, Quest Diagnostics, Windward and others. No longer can one big aerospace company leave and change the housing market for 2 years like in the 90’s. Santa Clarita has a strong diverse economy that will continue to fuel our housing market. Just look at film as a fun example of Santa Clarita really making progress in the last 20 years. To say that we have become “Hollywood North” is no joke. This year, we have 233 filming days, up 28% from last year. TV, movies, ads, video’s – we see it all here. The economic impact is over $70 million year-to-date. Because we are within the “Thirty Mile Zone” (TMZ), this part of our economy has exploded and we have the stages and natural topography to support a lot more growth in this area. The same can be said of all the sectors – when Advanced Bionics and Boston Scientific became growing community partners here in Santa Clarita, it attracted other similar business. This is what the SCVEDC really does an aggressive job of – attracting businesses of this type that offer desirable, high paying jobs here in Santa Clarita without a big commute involved. Health care has exploded in our valley and as the valley grows (our population is projected to basically double from 215000 to 450,000 by 2050) expect this area to really grow with it. And the list goes on.

 

In the 1990’s, you could argue we didn’t have the labor or the physical space to support a large, diverse business economy. Neither are true today. College of the Canyons in 1990 started a job training program that today is the envy of the Community College system. Partnering with local businesses to train their employees, these programs cover a huge cross section in both manufacturing and the service sector. Check out their new culinary institute, the food is incredible. Measured by salaries at completion and number of adults going back to college, COC is nationally recognized. We can thank the strong leadership at COC for starting that 25 years ago, today it is an attractive partner to companies looking to relocate that need skilled labor. Also, after years of a tight commercial/industrial market, 2016 brings us over 8 million square feet that is desperately needed for companies that want to move here. In the past, when companies expressed interest, we didn’t always have a place for them. This year that changed with 5 distinct business parks offering space for small to mid-size companies. These are new, well planned, energy efficient buildings, usually much better than what is available elsewhere in the city or Valley. Until recently, availability inventory has been less than 2%. Talk about a tight Real Estate market!

 

Finally, with the desire of both families and businesses to relocate to Santa Clarita, we need to have more homes available. I encourage you to google “Net Zero Newhall” which is the just announced plan for the long delayed Newhall Ranch. This development which has been in the works for years, will be the first master planned community of its kind. It will be water and energy efficient at a level never before seen to meet the State of California’s ambitious goals. Every home will have solar, an electric charging station for vehicles, all water will come from existing wells and be treated by its own water reclamation facilities paid for by the developer. There is a lot to share and certainly not everyone loves the idea of 16,000 homes off the 126, but this is incredibly well planned & designed, and will be the envy of the building community.  With a strong business community, an attractive median income of $92,000, a growing population and an organized group of leaders with a common vision, Santa Clarita looks like winner for long term Real Estate appreciation!


Why 2016 isn’t 2006…but it may still be the time to sell

July 8, 2016

Recently, I was discussing the market with a client and he was worried. “This market just seems….unsustainable,” he said. To be sure, 2016 has been better than expected for most. The market is red hot under $500,000 in Santa Clarita. There are so few properties, especially detached homes, for the amount of buyers waiting, it’s laughable. In the last 90 days, the higher price points of Canyon Country (over $600,000), Saugus (over $700,000) and Stevenson Ranch (over $900,000) have joined the party, with some of the highest numbers in years. Pretty much everywhere in Santa Clarita there aren’t enough quality homes under 1 million. Over that price point is a different story, but under 1 million? Universally, it’s pretty strong. So why was he worried? This is a homeowner, like many in our valley that remembers what happened in 2006-2012. Simply stated we went from a 100% sellers’ market in 2005 to a 100% buyers’ market in 2 years. Prices dropped so much that many neighborhoods are still 20% away from their peaks. He barely held onto his home. He remembers the almost silly euphoria of a market that seemed to have no possible chance of ever correcting; prices seemed to just naturally continue going up and never stopping. Like most of us, he knows that isn’t how Real Estate works.

My client isn’t alone. I have had more people, including Realtors, comment with concern that we MUST be nearing a peak. After all, we have 3 years of straight up appreciation. It will end, wont it? Yes, it will. And there may be a correction of some size when it does. It always happens that way, especially in California where the highs are really high and the lows really low. With all that said, there are virtually none of the factors in place to cause any kind of major correction in the market and I see no reason why the market under $500,000 won’t continue to chug forward in Santa Clarita and most other parts of California. The supply/demand equation is completely out of whack and there are ample buyers that can afford that price point. Affordability becomes a bigger concern over $500,000, but here is why we aren’t anything like 2006 and any correction that comes is likely to be small. First, 2006 was based on funny money loans, investor speculation and factors that not only don’t exist today, they couldn’t. No one has gotten a loan with nothing down that they can’t afford. Next, if some economic issue affected jobs or interest rates (the two biggest normal factors that cause a slump), virtually everyone has equity in their homes, unlike 2006. If they have to sell, they sell and get money. They don’t walk away. That is a BIG difference. Last, rents are so high that if someone didn’t have equity and couldn’t sell at a good price for a few years they can almost always rent their home out and cover their payment. There are many people in Santa Clarita that have done exactly that over the past few years waiting for the market to improve.

So, it’s safe to say we probably are near a peak.  Whatever correction we experience will be small or nonexistent under $500,000. My friend owns an $800,000 home. Should he be concerned? It depends. He lives in Northbridge Valencia where the supply/demand equation is also out of whack. Multiple offers are common place and the market defines “frothy”. This describes Fair Oaks Ranch, Stevenson Ranch, parts of Saugus and Castaic and a number of other popular areas in our valley. I would say to many of those people though, that if they are planning to sell I would look VERY carefully at sooner than later. My personal experience is that I have literally hundreds of clients that currently own homes larger than they need. I sold them these homes 10 or 15 years ago and the kids are gone. They don’t need that large a home anymore. But they aren’t selling. Some don’t know where they want to go, or they do but there isn’t much for sale. Or they just aren’t ready to let go. These are all good reasons. Some, however, are waiting for the market to go even higher, and that is where it gets dangerous. You can’t time these things; we’ve certainly learned that. In many cases, money and getting the highest possible price is a big concern. That is certainly understandable but the value of their property hasn’t been this high probably since 2006. No one can predict the future, but history does teach us that the appreciation will stop at some point. Maybe even take a step back. To that group of homeowners, it likely makes sense to make that move sooner than later. It’s tough sometimes making a move you aren’t 100% ready for. It’s tougher to try to make it when you have to and you are competing against dozens of homes instead of 2 or 3.


Inventory Tight, Prices Rising…and Some Homes Still Aren’t Selling?

April 20, 2016

If there is one thing that continues to smack me between the eyes about Real Estate, it’s that timing is truly everything. In January’s New Year blog, I suggested that 2016 should be a strong year for some sellers because of all the fundamentals – lack of inventory pushing up prices being at the top of the list. I expected, especially in the under $600,000 market, that we could easily see another 5-6% appreciation like we experienced in 2015…and we already have that. Ironically, we actually are behind 2015 April Pendings by about 20%, because of the lack of inventory. This is creating a strange and unusual occurrence in the market. Many people with nice starter homes aren’t selling them, even though they would like to, because there aren’t many available homes to move up to. So they just stay put. Many people with larger homes, with kids out of the house, are ready to downsize. But we don’t have the smaller homes, and especially single story homes that would potentially interest them. So they just stay put. Those that are pursuing moving in a tight market are loving the reaction they get as a seller, and not loving trying to buy in a tight market. The first time buyers are driving the prices up of starter condos and small homes like it was 2004, with multiple offers happening on about anything in decent condition. And because sellers of these properties are fighting over limited quality homes in the $500,000-$800,000 range, that part of the market has caught fire too.

 

Here are some examples from the first quarter. Condos in parts of Canyon Country that you practically couldn’t give away a few years ago, sell immediately. The 2 bedroom plus loft on Sierra Highway that was at $210,000 last summer is today $250,000. The townhome in Valencia Northbridge that was $325000 last summer is today $370,000 and good luck finding one. In Santa Clarita, if you want to buy something under $300,000 many agents will simply say they can’t help you. For the move up buyers, what was $735,000 in that same Northbridge Valencia area last summer (5 beds and a pool) is today pushing $800,000. In fact, I just closed escrow on 27306 Blueridge at $825,000. It is one of only two sales over $800,000 in the last 2 years, but it won’t be the last. Its been years since homes like that were over $800,000, but they are again, at least for now. Even more head slapping is the Copper Hill North part of Saugus. Last summer there were over 20 homes for sale over 2,500 square feet. Many were on the market over 60 days. Many had to reduce their price to sell. Some didn’t sell and came off the market. Those same homes if they come back on the market now would find only a few homes they compete against and likely sell with virtually no changes in condition or price….simply because they compete against so little compared to last summer. So, as they say, timing is indeed everything.

 

So why are some homes still sitting, sometimes for months at a time? That can be even more head scratching! In my discussions with other top agents, they have described this market as “weird,” “unpredictable,” “erratic” and my personal favorite “I don’t even know what to tell sellers over $800,000 anymore.” And I’m getting this from agents all around Southern California too. In short, if you have a home in Santa Clarita under $800,000 and it isn’t getting offers, you are either in a weird pocket where there isn’t much demand or there is a problem with your condition. If you are over $800,000 and especially over $1,000,000, the market can be tricky. Sometimes, one home in a neighborhood will sell immediately while others sit for months. In the same neighborhood! A perfect example came last month when I put a single story on the market in Circle J at $1,150,000. There were 5 others on the market, many for months, all without having seen offers. My single story had been on the market before with other agents and hadn’t sold. With a few small changes we sold at almost asking price in 10 days. How would you like to be those other 5 sellers wondering what the heck just happened? On the flip side, I have a terrific Westridge view home for sale at $999,900 with plenty of showings. Four agents have called me stating they expect to write an offer and not one has. Because of the lack of competing homes, it wouldn’t surprise me if I bring the seller two offers out of the blue…or that it takes me another 6 weeks to sell it. It’s just that unpredictable in this part of the market. Buyers looking, maybe not always offering. I am seeing this finally start to change though. There is so little for sale in Stevenson Ranch that homes that would have been $750,000 6 months ago are coming on the market at $850,000. I’m showing them because there isn’t anything else to show our buyers! Are they overpriced? Maybe, but if they sell, maybe not. The sellers of those starter homes that are buying and driving up prices in Saugus in the $700,000+ market are starting to be seen in the slightly higher price points of Westridge and Stevenson Ranch. Again, timing is truly everything, and in the over one million market, patience may be mandatory.

 


Will 2016 be as good as 2015 in Real Estate?

January 21, 2016

Sometimes in Real Estate you can look at the fundamentals – not enough homes for sale, agents trying to find buyers homes without success, continued low interest rates, great new loan programs, higher rents that should be driving buyers to purchase… and conclude prices should go up this year. I fully expect that to happen in many parts of the market, following the 6% appreciation we saw for SCV in 2015.

However, the second half of 2015 was much slower than the first half in terms of new sales, including in new construction. In the higher price points of Santa Clarita, over $750,000 and especially over $900,000, the last 5 months have seen significantly less foot traffic, offers and sales. That isn’t terribly unusual but it’s been so much slower that even the LA Times commented that it was happening all over Southern California and they couldn’t conclude whether it was a lack of affordability, or a lack of inventory. I would like to suggest it is a bit of both, being that today’s buyer is more educated than ever and increasingly unwilling to buy a home at higher prices just to buy a home. To understand better what we might see in 2016, here are 3 trends happening as we speak in the marketplace.

First, there are parts of our valley right now that have so little for sale that sellers waiting for the “Spring selling season” are making a mistake in waiting. The conventional wisdom is that there are more buyers out looking in Spring and sellers want to wait for that. I can’t disagree with that IF you have a move-up buyer home, especially in the higher price points that have been so slow. HOWEVER, I have spoken to dozens of would-be sellers these first few weeks of the year and begged them to list now because there are virtually no homes they compete against. And there are buyers, though maybe not as many as in 2 months, out there. As a seller, would you rather compete against 2 homes or 7 or 8? When you study the trends of inventory going up and down, it is so obvious to see that the main reason sellers have success or failure in most parts of our valley is due to what they compete against, not what month of the year it is. The most obvious example right now is a part of Saugus we call “Copper Hill North.” These are homes over 2300 square feet, newer, that sell between $575,000 and $750,000. There have been times in the last 12 months where there would be 15-25 homes for sale and even nice homes would take 45-90 days to sell. Today, there are 6 and I get calls and emails from agents daily looking for a nice home in this area for their motivated buyer. I sure wouldn’t wait until April if I had one of those, there could be another dozen homes to compete against by then, and probably will be.

Second, today’s buyer is more educated and conservative than ever. To a seller this means that just because you don’t have a lot of homes to compete against, potential buyers won’t pay the price of a fully upgraded home if yours hasn’t had that done to it. In today’s market, homes will sit if they are mostly original but priced like the upgraded competition. The good news is that if you have put a lot into your home, buyers will recognize that and pay a premium. That hasn’t always been the case in the past. Also, today’s buyer will rarely buy the top dollar amount they can afford. It is completely common for me to have a buyer that qualifies up to $700,000 but won’t buy for more than $600,000. What all of this means in 2016, is that knowing how many buyers are out there when you put your home for sale, and what they want is more important than ever. Further, as I said last year, the best buyer in today’s market remains the seller/buyer. That buyer is selling a home and either moving up to a larger home or down to a smaller one. In 2015, half of our buyers were this type of buyer. That trend likely continues in 2016. If the market doesn’t heat up, knowing who represents these buyers, and getting them in your home, will be crucial for sellers in 2016 to have success.

Third, because the seller/buyer is so important in the Santa Clarita Real Estate market, and because what is hot in January may not be as hot in June, and because these inventory cycles are so unpredictable…..sellers willing to do a double move before buying will truly have the best potential to “sell high and buy low.” Here is what I mean. Many seller/buyers want to sell and move right into their new home. No one can blame them for that, since moving into a temporary situation is a hassle and an extra expense. However, many sellers that will only sell if they can buy simultaneously, can’t time the whole selling/buying process to their advantage. Meaning, they may have a buyer but no home they like at that exact moment, and their buyer goes elsewhere. The seller that wants to buy in that tough Copper Hill area could sell now at top dollar, do an interim move, wait for more and better inventory to come on the market and maybe even negotiate the price down on a better home. If they sell and attempt to buy now they could easily be up against other offers. If they sell now, but wait for the inventory to go up, AND IT ALWAYS DOES, they can truly sell in a hot market and buy in a more balanced one, taking advantage of the timing. I am seeing more and more seller/buyers do this and it is giving them a better home, a better buying experience and thousands of dollars in their pocket.

Understanding these three trends can help you navigate what should be a solid 2016 for sellers and buyers alike. Why some homes take a long time to sell, or have to reduce their price, can usually be explained by understanding these trends.  2015 was for me and many other agents one of our best years in Real Estate. 2016 can be the same if we pay attention to what is happening and take advantage of what the market offers. Happy New Year!


A HOLIDAY LOAN GIFT TO BUYERS & SELLERS!

November 12, 2015

In Santa Clarita, if you want to buy a property under $400,000, over 80% of your choices will be condos and townhomes. Historically, most of the buyers for these properties have been first time buyers with the majority using FHA loans to purchase. FHA loans are popular for two reasons: First, low down payments (3.5% down) and Second, lower credit scores (low 600’s) can still get you a loan. FHA buyers have powered our entry level market for years.

FHA loans do come with a catch. The complex the subject property is in has to be “FHA approved,” meaning a detailed review is conducted of the HOA financials and a whole host of other things before deciding whether they want to loan there. At one time, virtually every complex in our valley was FHA approved. These approvals however have time limits and have to be re-approved every few years. For a variety of reasons, dozens of complexes in Santa Clarita have lost their approval. Often it is because the HOA board doesn’t understand, or see the need to spend the money to get re-approved with FHA. Sometimes they just don’t want to deal with the Government paperwork. Other times the rental rate in the complex has become too high (over 50%) for the FHA to continue loaning there. The net result for homeowners in those complexes is a huge reduction in potential buyers and a loss in value. Most homeowners don’t have a clue how big a deal this is until they go to sell and find out their complex lost its approval – in many cases within the last 2 years.

This is not only a problem for the owners of these properties facing a loss in value, it’s also extremely frustrating for buyers who want to purchase but are shut out because the only loan available to them can’t buy them what is available in their price range. The majority of these buyers just don’t have the 10-20% down payment needed to get a “conventional” loan, and conventional loans often limit the assistance from family (“gift funds” or “co-signing”) that would allow them to put more down. This problem, however, is about to be solved by 2 new lending programs coming available next month that are truly gifts that both buyers and sellers may find the best gift they get this Holiday season!
These new loan have so many terrific qualities it’s almost hard to imagine and I believe will not only spur the entry level market, but the move up market from $400,000 to $700,000 as well. First, for buyers with a purchase price up to $427,250, they can put a minimum of 3% down.  For buyers above that price point, the requirement is only 5% down which is also a low down payment loan to help first timers. Next, the loan amount goes up to $625,500, which is huge in areas like Southern California where prices are high. Further, unlike expensive FHA loans which have huge up front closing costs (in most cases about $10,000 to get the loan before you get in) and monthly mortgage insurance on top of that, there is NO MORTGAGE INSURANCE that many buyers consider money flushed down the toilet each month when their credit is stellar. Your credit has to be good (above 700 FICO), but if it is, you are in business.

But wait, there is more! The down payment can be a gift!!  For parents of Millennials, like me, that want to help their children avoid sky high rents and enjoy home ownership this is a low cost loan that I can help them with, that avoids excessive fees and is at today’s low market interest rates. Even better, family members can also co-sign to help get the loan! Because it is also a traditional Fannie Mae loan, you can get it from virtually any lender. It becomes available December 12! For a number of years when the market was soft, people would say to me they thought it was because loans were so hard to get. In most cases that was a small reason why, but it was more due to declining values. Today, it is soft even when we have a lack of inventory to spur buyers and sellers, in part because many don’t have an available fairly priced loan product – especially for first time buyers and first time move-up buyers. This new loan changes that. Happy holidays!


Are you paying too much in Property taxes??

September 26, 2015

Every year, I can gauge what is trending in Real Estate by the questions I get from all of my great past clients. Property taxes are at the top of the list, mostly because they want to know if they are being properly assessed, how they are assessed and what their new taxes will be if they move. These are all easy questions to answer individually, and I am always happy to get them “comps” (recent sales like their home) to understand why they pay what they pay, and if it is indeed too much. Honestly, it’s rarely too much based on market value. Until this year when I learned something I never knew before.

To explain, it’s important to understand how our taxes are determined and changed when we go through a decline in value as we did in 2006-2012. I will keep it simple. There are always small exceptions to the rules but this will cover 98% of us. We all pay taxes based on what we paid for our house. If you bought your home in 2005 and it went down in value, you can file a form called a “decline in value review”, provide sales supplied by your friendly Realtor, and your taxes were reduced after being reviewed. I’ve helped hundreds of people do this. The idea is to pay taxes based on “market value”, not necessarily what you paid for the home if values did decline, which of course, they did. I recently had the opportunity to meet with new LA County tax Assessor Jeffrey Prang. Nice guy. Wants to bring the County’s outdated computer systems up to date and improve accuracy in valuations. Which, when I explain what is happening with the tax bills we all will receive by November 1, I suspect you will want that to happen too!

A lot of how your taxes are determined goes back to the old Proposition 13 that still affect what you and I pay today. In effect since 1978, most people think it allows people who live in their homes for a long time to not pay current valuations so they can “afford” to live there. This is certainly true. Proposition 13 specifically states that property taxes can be raised only 2% per year. If you bought a home in the 70’s or 80’s, and still live there today, you are likely paying taxes at a small fraction of today’s market value. If I sold you a home in Northbridge Valencia for $350,000 in 1997, you paid 1% of that $350,000 as the base rate for LA County and approximately another .25% for the “supplementals” that we all pay – for fire, flood, library, sewer etc. Everyone’s supplementals can vary a bit (especially if your neighborhood has a landscape district or even worse, expensive Mello Roos bonds), but we quote taxes as “1.25% in LA County”, and it’s pretty accurate. So that house you bought in 1997 had a base rate of $3,500 a year in property taxes, and if values rose (which they did, that house today is worth $700,000), the MOST your property taxes could go up is about $70 a year. Again, it’s design was to avoid taxing people out of being able to afford their home, even if the neighbor that just purchased is paying almost double. Everyone accepts that is what Proposition 13 provides.

What Prop 13 also says however, is if you had a decline in value and reduced your taxes over the last 8 or 9 years, when value go up again the 2% rule DOESN’T APPLY. In fact, according to Jeffrey Prang, the assessor is in the middle of restoring taxes in most cases to pre-recession levels, which may be fine if you live in Manhattan Beach or Silicon Valley. It will most definitely not be fine for many people in Santa Clarita. And that is exactly what came up on my radar this summer when clients called with their new valuations, which weren’t even close to what market value is. One client bought a triplex from me for $700,000 at the height of the market in Newhall. He had his taxes reduced in 2008 to a realistic $475,000, which was the value at that time. They’ve come up a bit, but still were assessed below $500,000…until this year. Market value today is about $625,000, but he has been assessed at $810,000! Worse, after examining why, they are using properties from the San Fernando Valley when properties in Newhall exist, they just aren’t using them! Another client with a home in Valencia had the assessed value raised from $565,000 to $880,000 and that isn’t close to current market value – which is about $700,000.

When I questioned Mr. Prang about this, he admitted that they use “averages” for areas to come up with values. Meaning, if they use the wrong homes to “average” you can be assessed to pay a lot more in property taxes than you should. Further, they have a 40,000 case backlog of appeals for new valuations already and you have to pay the new value until your dispute is resolved. Further, the amount of appraisers employed in the Sylmar field office is a fraction of what it needs to be, so it will likely be awhile before you can have your appeal reviewed if in fact your valuation is now TOO HIGH for today’s actual value. When I questioned him about using properties from 30 miles away when comps within a 2 mile radius were available, he admitted “that shouldn’t happen”. So here we go again, watch what your new tax bill says. If you had your taxes reduced in the last 9 years due to decline in value, REALLY check your new assessed value. If it is out of line, I have the forms in my office.